The Big Phil photo
Forum rules
This forum will sometimes contain copyrighted information, however, it is placed here under Title 17
Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
This forum will sometimes contain copyrighted information, however, it is placed here under Title 17
Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
-
- MABRC Chief Forum Administrator, MABRC Executive Director
- Posts: 2741
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:34 am
The Big Phil photo
You the reader be the judge, but after looking at this, it was considered a hoax when it first surfaced. Matt Moneymaker got Wally Hershom to fork out 10 grand to buy this picture.
- Attachments
-
- Wisconsin Expedition 2006 Notes_ Big Phil.pdf
- The BFRO report on this photo, just for the sake of argument.
- (1.08 MiB) Downloaded 482 times
-
- Chat Center
-
- You do not have permission to post in chat.
@
admin « Tue 1:35 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:56 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:55 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:54 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:53 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:53 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:52 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:51 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:50 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:50 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:49 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:46 am »
@
BrianDriver « Sat 12:59 pm »
@
admin « Thu 9:09 pm »