PLEASE NOTE: This video discussed here was exposed as a intentional hoax by the folks who filmed it, the "bigfoot" is someone in a black hoodie.
Loren Coleman, Cryptomundo wrote:
The recent video from Spokane, Washington, has gone viral with nearly 600,000 views on Youtube.
Is the simple nature of the moving images the cause of its successful following? Or is it because of the clarity of the images?
Perhaps tired of blurry blobsquatchs, viewers are welcoming this new video quite openly.
Also, is it fulfilling people’s hopes that modern technology will cause more videos of cryptids to be captured?
Was this the first Bigfoot video shot with an iPhone?
Every so often a video of “bigfoot” goes viral leaving the public questioning its authenticity. And this week is no different!
A video of an alleged bigfoot popped up on the internet this week. It was shot by a Washington woman who claims to have “accidentally” caught the creature on camera while hiking in the woods.
Jessica Sinclair
Long Island Press
A Spokane, Washington woman, out for a hike with friends two weekends ago, says she may have captured video of the mythical Bigfoot, the elusive man-ape hybrid who walks upright, has excessive body hair, and seems impervious to in-focus photography.
As reported by KXLY TV in Spokane, the young woman, identified only as “Samantha,” was shooting video in a wooded area near the Spokane River when a tall, shadowy humanoid (with seemingly bad posture) was caught on film. Because the creature was some distance away, she didn’t notice it at the time.
But when Samantha got home and watched the video, she spotted the mysterious stranger moving left-to-right through the frame, the report says. A few days later, she posted the clip on YouTube. The video has since gone viral with more than 579,000 views as of the afternoon of May 30.
Jeff Bertolucci
PCWorld
Spokane Bigfoot Video Goes Viral
Forum rules
This forum will sometimes contain copyrighted information, however, it is placed here under Title 17
Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
This forum will sometimes contain copyrighted information, however, it is placed here under Title 17
Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
-
- Chat Center
-
- You do not have permission to post in chat.
@
admin « Tue 1:35 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:56 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:55 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:54 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:53 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:53 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:52 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:51 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:50 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:50 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:49 am »
@
yankeesearch « Tue 12:46 am »
@
BrianDriver « Sat 12:59 pm »
@
admin « Thu 9:09 pm »